// search visibility
Outreach That Earns Links and Citations
You have the study, the tool or the teardown. You have a shortlist of publications you want it in front of. What you do not have is anyone with the weeks it takes to write two hundred individual emails to two hundred named people. That last part is what this is: research, pitch, follow-up, and the relationship that outlives the campaign.
So this page is the labour, not the plan and not the asset. What gets published, which sites are worth appearing on, where the links should point. All three belong to link building, linked at the top of this page. That service builds the thing and picks the targets, this one puts it in front of people. Nothing here touches your own site’s crawling, indexing or architecture, which the technical SEO page owns. Whether an assistant quotes you inside a generated answer is measured on its own page too.
Why this page says blogger outreach and not SEO outreach
Because the shorter term reads as job-seeker intent. Start typing “seo outreach” into Google and seven of the nine completions it offers are about jobs, hiring or outreach tools. That is the language of people who want to be paid to do this work, not of people looking to buy it.
It is autocomplete, not the results page. We have not audited what actually ranks there, and we are not going to pretend we have. It was still enough to decide with, because a page written to win that query would face an audience with nothing to purchase. So this one is named for what it sells, a blogger outreach service. If you came here looking for a link outreach agency, that is the same job under a different label.
What we actually send
Prospects come from the surfaces that already cover your category: the publications, newsletters, maintainers, community moderators and independent writers your buyers read. Not a purchased list. For each one we identify the individual, not the contact form, and we verify the address before it is used.
The email itself is short, written for that person, and references something they published. It states plainly what we are offering and why it is useful to their readers. One follow-up, at most. Then we stop, and we record that they were contacted so no colleague of ours writes to them again next quarter.
Guest post outreach is one route among several and never the default. We pitch a contributed article only where a publication has a real editor and a real readership. A site that accepts anything passes on no value. It also tells every future reader something about your judgement. More often the ask is smaller: a correction, a data point they can cite, an addition to a list they already maintain.
Sending happens from a domain we own and have warmed, with SPF, DKIM and DMARC in place. Your primary domain is never used for cold mail. Saving a subdomain is not worth risking the reputation of the domain your invoices leave from.
Why the number we report is placements per 100 contacts
Because volume flatters. A campaign that sends thousands of emails to earn a handful of links is not a successful campaign. It is a spam campaign that happened to land a few times, and the cost of it lands on your name, not ours. Reporting the contacts alongside the placements makes the ratio impossible to hide. When the ratio is poor, the fix is a better list or a better asset, not a bigger send. That is the decision the number exists to force.
The same work produces two kinds of result. A placement on a site that is read and maintained is a link. It is also a passage of text that AI assistants can retrieve and quote when someone asks about your category. Nobody can promise the second, so we do not treat it as a bonus. It is still the reason five placements on sites that are genuinely read beat fifty on sites that exist to carry links.
Five things we turn down
- Pay for placements. Google’s link spam policy treats money, goods or services exchanged for links as a violation. Paying a site a fee for a followed line in a post is that transaction with a nicer invoice on it.
- Invent a person. No fake journalist personas, no borrowed credentials, no pretending to be staff at a publication we are not.
- Mass-generate pitches. No scraped list of five thousand addresses, no spun templates, no sequence that keeps writing to someone who has not replied.
- Use guest post farms, private blog networks or reciprocal link schemes. They are the category of site that gets devalued first. The placements disappear along with them.
- Promise a number of links. The person who decides is an editor we do not employ and cannot pay. A number we could actually guarantee would be a number we had bought. We commit to the volume sent, the reporting cadence and your right to stop the engagement in week two.
When this is the wrong thing to buy
If you have nothing worth linking to yet, outreach cannot help, because distribution does not manufacture the thing being distributed. A campaign that pitches your pricing page will fail politely and quietly. It will also use up the contacts that a good asset would have converted later. If that is where you are, the honest sequence is to build one citable thing first. Original data, a free tool, a teardown nobody else has written. That build is the link building half of this pair, and it has to happen before the distribution half is worth paying for. We say so before the engagement starts, not three months into it.
What you get
- A prospect list built by hand, naming the individual, the page that qualified them, and why your topic is relevant to theirs
- Every pitch written per prospect and visible to you in full before it is sent
- A dedicated sending domain we own, with SPF, DKIM and DMARC configured and the reputation warmed before the first campaign
- A live log of contacts, replies, refusals and placements, with the ratio between them always on screen
- Placements handed over as live URLs, with the editorial context each one landed in
- A written relationship handover naming who said yes, who said not yet, and what was agreed with each of them
How it runs
- 01
Agree what is worth pitching
Outreach distributes an asset. It cannot invent one. We settle first on exactly what is being offered, and confirm it already exists. A pitch with nothing behind it burns a contact permanently, and those contacts do not regenerate.
- 02
Build the list by hand
A scraped list is the reason most outreach reads like spam. Each prospect is qualified against something the person actually published, so the first line of the email is true and specific, not a merge field.
- 03
Send at human volume, from our domain
Small batches from a warmed domain we control, never yours. Cold sending carries bounce and complaint risk, and that damage attaches to whichever domain sent the mail, including the one your invoices go through.
- 04
Report contacts and placements together
A link count on its own hides how much goodwill was spent earning it. Showing both numbers makes the ratio visible, which is what tells you whether the list or the pitch is the thing that needs fixing.
- 05
Hand the relationships back
We record who replied, what they asked for, and what was promised. An editor relationship that exists only inside an agency inbox is an asset you were renting without being told.
Questions we get asked
- How many links will we get?
- We will not give you a number before seeing what there is to pitch. Response depends on the asset, the category and whether anyone has heard of you. What we will do is report placements against contacts from the first week. The rate is visible early, so you can stop the engagement cheaply if it is bad.
- How is this different from the link building page?
- Link building builds and sets the strategy. What we publish to make a link worth giving, which sites are worth appearing on, and where the links should land. This page distributes what that produced. The prospecting, the pitching, the follow-up, and the relationship afterwards all sit here. You can buy the building and the distribution together, or hand us a plan you already have and buy only the sending.
- Do you pay bloggers for placements?
- No. Google's link spam policy treats money, goods or services exchanged for links as a violation. Paid placements are among the first things an update removes. If a site's only response to a pitch is a price list, we take it off the list and tell you it happened.
- Will you send from our domain?
- No, unless you insist in writing and accept the risk. Cold outreach produces bounces and the occasional spam complaint. We send from a domain we own and have warmed. A campaign that goes badly cannot damage the deliverability of your invoices, your password resets or your support mail.
- Is this spam with better manners?
- It becomes spam at volume, when the list is bought and the pitch is generic. The test we apply to every list is whether the person would be glad we wrote even if they never linked. When the answer is no for most of the list, the list is wrong. We rebuild it instead of sending it.
- Our category is boring. Does anyone link to us?
- Usually yes, just not the audience you are picturing. Dull categories are covered by trade press, standards bodies, procurement and compliance writers. By suppliers, training providers and forum moderators. And by the one independent consultant everyone in the sector forwards. Those people are far easier to reach than a national journalist. They are also more likely to be read by someone who can actually buy from you. Finding them is most of the prospecting work.