// MAP monitoring

Strategies for Effective MAP Policy Compliance

Published
Updated
Author
Ben
Filed under
MAP monitoring

Measure a compliance rate. A violation count rises when you look harder and falls when you look less, so on its own it reports effort and nothing else.

The rate is violations divided by every listing found for a part, compliant ones included. That means compliant listings have to be recorded and kept, which a violation alert does not do.

Take a baseline before the first notice goes out

Run monitoring for a period and write down the rate before any enforcement starts. Without a starting number, every later claim about the programme working is an opinion. A quiet quarter and a working programme look identical in the data.

Why a rotating sample under-reports

Sampling part of the catalogue produces a number that describes the sample. A seller who discounts the parts nobody audits stays invisible in it, and those are usually the parts where the margin makes discounting worth doing.

Cover the whole SKU list, or state plainly that the figure is a sample figure and stop calling it a compliance rate.

Check at times a seller does not expect

Price changes are scheduled. A seller drops below policy on a Friday evening and comes back on Monday morning. They are compliant in every weekday business hours crawl ever run. Move the checks around, including weekends and public holidays.

Match on more than your own part number

Listings routinely carry a distributor’s number, a wholesale number, or one the seller invented. Matching on your part number alone misses all of those, and it produces the tidiest report you will ever read.

Build a cross-reference from your catalogue and from distributor numbering, then match against the whole of it.

The advertised price is not the listed number

MAP applies to the price a shopper is shown, and the number in the listing field is one input to that. A stacked coupon. A bundle that buries the discount. An add to cart gate that exists so the price is never displayed. All three change what was advertised. Monitoring that reads the listing field alone reports those sellers as compliant.

What a monthly review should answer

Four questions, in this order. What is the rate this month against last month. Which sellers moved from violating to compliant after contact. Which sellers were contacted and ignored it. Which listings could not be tied to an identifiable seller at all.

The last one predicts next quarter. An unidentified seller cannot be written to, so it stays in your figures until the supply route behind it is found.

We run this for automotive and powersports brands. MAP monitoring and enforcement sets out what the service covers.

Need a MAP policy that actually holds?

Book a strategy call